Youth4Democracy. Evaluation of the first study visit in Vilnius.

Dear Youth4Democracy participants,

Here you have the evaluation form of the event. Please answer the questions and give us your opinion about the study visit. Your opinion is very important and can help to improve the upcoming study visits.

The questionnaire is anonymous.

Rezultatai yra viešai prieinami

1	2	3	4	5
Meeting with the Parliament member, Mr. Paulius Saudargas

Meeting with the Vilnius regional council Chairwoman, Ms. Ingrida Mažonavičiūtė

Meeting with the representatives of the Department of Youth Affairs, Mrs. Sandra Jančiauskaitė-Aragroug and Mr. Juozas Meldžiukas

Meeting with the representatives of the Ministry of Social Security ans Labour, Ms. Justina Alsytė and Mrs. Areta Miškinienė

Presentation of European Youth Forum and European Youth Policy, Ms. Guoda Lomanaitė

1	2	3	4	5
Aims and visions of Youth policy in Lithuania, by Karolis Žemaitis

Legal basis: a law/laws, situation of youth NGO’s, by Rūta Beinoriūtė

Local municipality youth policy situation, by Simonas Šeškis

Stakeholder roles; model and structure, by Lukas Račickas

Lithuanian Youth Council, by Mantas Jurgutis

1	2	3	4	5
Aims and visions of Youth policy in Lithuania, by Karolis Žemaitis

Legal basis: a law/laws, situation of youth NGO’s, by Rūta Beinoriūtė

Stakeholder roles; model and structure, by Lukas Račickas

Lithuanian Youth Council, by Mantas Jurgutis

Local municipality youth policy situation, by Simonas Šeškis

1	2	5	3	4
Activities

Moderator

Length

Need

Overall

1	2	3	4	5
Lithuanian Scouting, by Karolis Žemaitis

Etnoclub, by Rūta Beinoriūtė

Lithuanian Liberal Youth, by Lukas Račickas

Lithuanian School Student’s Union, by Simonas Šeškis

1	2	3	4	5
Information provided before the event

Information provided during the event

Venue of the event

Accomodation

Food

LiJOT staff work during the event

Youth4Democracy. Evaluation of the first study visit in Vilnius.

How would you evaluate the team building activities? (1-poor, 5-very good)

How would you evaluate the relevancy of the arranged meetings and presentations? (1-poor, 5-very good)

How would you evaluate the presentations of the Action group members? Consider relevancy (1-poor, 5-very good)

How would you evaluate the presentations of the Action group members? Consider content (1-poor, 5-very good)

How would you evaluate the presentations of the youth organizations? (1-poor, 5-very good)

How would you evaluate the management of the event? (1-poor, 5-good)

Additional comments

How would you evaluate the study visit overall? (1-poor, 5-very good)